Assad said that the credibility of Main stream media have lost in the last two decades. He also mentioned about the war in Syria.Watch the full video for more.  Assad: "West is telling Russia that Syrian Army went too far in defeating terrorists.  "  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLeNB_JtdTg 
"Mainstream media has no morals." -Dr Assad

​Primordial Chunks:"Assad: "West is telling Russia that Syrian Army went too far in defeating terrorists."  Let's re-title that: West says Syria went too far in defeating WESTERN BACKED terrorists." 132 likes
- thesouluniversal:"Assad spoke nothing but sense, our own corrupt politicians would have us believe he was an evil madman, liars. " 27 likes
- believe it:"The FACTS of the issue shows that ASSAD is in the right, 100%."
- titty mcfoster:"Good to see that Assad is doing well. What a fantastic and charismatic leader! Assad is on the right side of history. May God be with him."  72 likes
- Thabani T-Bowse Hadebe:"I would vote for this man!" 79 likes
- Mahyar K:"The Cia/Mossad/and MI5 are pissed they have spent to much money to fail, lets hope no false flags happen. " 11 likes
- Umair Khan:"Syria was the last country to stand between Arab world and Greater israel/gas pipeline project. You fought bravely Mr Assad. You have balls of steel. This might be a turning point for middle east." 32 likes
- Truth:"You can't Mossad the Assad."
- Loane Sharp:"I only recently heard about the gas pipeline angle to this story. And I also heard about the offshore oil and gas discovery in Somalia and Kenya. Guess where the next "war on terror" will be fought? "
​.- BLACKCROW WALKING:"The decades control of the Mainstream Media is coming to an abrupt end!!"
- matthew marsh:"@1330 he says US creates chaos to use it to their advantage."​

The Pentagon and State Department, echoed as usual by the mainstream press, have expressed “concern” about Russian deliveries of the most modern tanks, fighter aircraft, surface-to-air missiles and other military equipment to Syria. They call them “counterproductive,” although it’s not clear what sort of productive cause they counter.
They say these shipments—which they’ve tried to thwart by instructing NATO allies to deny delivery flights through their airspace—are likely “to prolong the war” in that tragically suffering country. Cable news anchors, with furrowed brows and glaring eyes, warn their viewers that Moscow’s stepped-up support for the Assad regime is a “worrisome development.”
Moscow responds blandly that Russia (and the Soviet Union before it) have been allied to the Syrian government since the 1950s, when (like the U.S., actually) it saw the secular Baathists as a preferable alternative to Islamist throughout the region. Russia has been Syria’s main arms supplier for decades, and is (according to RT television) currently filling contracts with Damascus signed years ago.
(Moscow might add that it has maintained a naval base at Tartus on the Syrian coast since 1971, and an airbase at Latakia. These are among Russia’s foreign military basis, which you can count on one hand. The U.S. in contrast has, as you know, well over 700 military bases in over 135 countries where around 300,000 U.S. troops are stationed.)
The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly urged the establishment of an international coalition to fight ISIL, which seems rational enough on the face of it. While it has not yet killed as many people as George W. Bush did, this well funded, growing organization, rapidly evolving into a viable state, is as manifestly cruel as the former U.S. president and his cabinet of amoral neocons hell-bent on imposing their own sort of caliphate on Southwest Asia. It is surely evil.​

   Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister Adel Al-Jubeir (left) in New York with US secretary of state John Kerry.     Photograph: Craig Ruttle/AP            
Saudi Arabia: Assad cannot stay in power  This post was originally published on this site. Guardian
Saudi Arabia (world's pre-eminent beheaders) has called on Bashar al-Assad to give up power or be removed by force. The threat was made on Tuesday by Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, Adel Al-Jubeir. 
“There is no future for Assad in Syria,” Jubeir told journalists at the UN general assembly. “There are two options for a settlement in Syria. One option is a political process where there would be a transitional council. The other option is a military option, which also would end with the removal of Bashar al-Assad from power. This could be a more lengthy process and a more destructive process but the choice is entirely that of Bashar al-Assad.”  The foreign minister did not specify how Assad would be forcibly removed, but pointed out that Saudi Arabia is already backing “moderate rebels” in the civil war. 
       
COMMENTS of people from the discussion on Facebook about this article:
'In a slightly less imperfect world there'd be no future for the House of Saud utterly corrupt monarchy! Is Syria attacking the United States? What is the real reason the United States is involved in this ? What would the United States government do if another nation injected itself into US national government ?  I am very confused by all this aggressive behavior on behalf of my government. We are funding fundamentalist Islamists. Why? At least Russia is a long standing ally of Syria, does it not make sense that they would assist Assad? This is all too confusing to me and makes no sense at all. Why do ISIS militants have so much US weaponry? Don't you think that these questions should be answered at least at a basic level? Are these reasonable questions?'
- Frank Pastuck:"And we listen to them for what reason again? Oil is an all time low..." 
- Bill Franklin:"In with the Israel? Maybe PUTIN WILL KICK BOTH THEIR  ASSESS". 

Lyndon LaRouche reveals the strategic priorities for today.
The following is an excerpt of comments made by Lyndon LaRouche, Tuesday, January 27, 2015.
What we're doing is, we're actually saying, that we, as an organization, are saying to the nation as such, that we have given out the orders that what must be done, because Wall Street is bankrupt; and the bankruptcy of Wall Street must not be allowed to sink the Treasury system of the U.S. economy. Therefore, you have to have an intervening term, a method with which you foreclose Wall Street. Foreclose that thing; shut it down

In a wide-ranging discussion with colleagues on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2015 Lyndon LaRouche called for immediate action at the level of the U.S. presidency to bankrupt Wall Street and replace it immediately with an interim system of Federal credit to launch urgently needed capital-intensive infrastructure and job creation.  LaRouche emphasized that without such immediate actions, the already ongoing collapse of the Wall Street bubble will be the trigger for thermonuclear war with Russia, which will be a war of extinction for all of mankind.
LaRouche called on his colleagues to take up the actions of all great American presidents, who all launched policies that were never before undertaken.
"We need immediate, appropriate measures to shut down Wall Street.  The Alexander Hamilton principle is our model,” LaRouche declared, adding that “The rate of bankruptcy of Wall Street is increasing.  This is why emergency action is required immediately."
"The alternative is thermonuclear war with Russia.  We must put Obama under control by putting a new economic system in place.  Either we go to a Hamiltonian policy or the situation is hopeless,"