President Trump announced earlier this month his administration's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the Israeli capital and begin the process of moving the U.S. Embassy to the disputed city. The move bucked decades of U.S. diplomatic policy and fulfilled a key campaign promise — but it also immediately set off a widespread backlash in countries around the world, who believe it would significantly undermine the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians, who also claim Jerusalem as the capital of a prospective state.
As Israel lauded the move, the country's Arab neighbors condemned it as a violation of an international resolution that forbids attempts "to alter the character and status" of the city before the peace process has concluded. And beyond the Middle East, countries across the West quickly reiterated that their own embassies would not move from their present locations in Tel Aviv.
Meanwhile, in the Palestinian territories, protests escalated into clashes between demonstrators and Israeli authorities. And rocket fire from the Gaza Strip was answered with Israeli airstrikes.

UN votes 128-9 to declare US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital 'null and void' - as Britain jeopardizes its special relationship with America by voting AGAINST Trump.
​
The U.N. Security Council sought earlier this week to vote on a measure that would have demanded that states refrain from placing their diplomatic missions in Jerusalem. Without naming the U.S. or Trump, the resolution nevertheless would have proclaimed Trump's decision null and void.  The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly rejected the Trump administration's decision to recognize the disputed city of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. By a 128-9 vote Thursday, the diplomats gathered in New York City ignored U.S. objections and approved a nonbinding resolution calling on countries to avoid moving their embassies to Jerusalem. Every country on the council, including U.S. allies, voted for the measure  — but the U.S., which holds veto power, blocked the vote.

BREAKING: 9/11, Filling in the Map, Tracing the Nukes
​On October 5, 2016 By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of Veterans Today (Journal for the clandestine community) http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/10/05/911-filling-in-the-map-tracing-the-nukes/ 

"We have another update from VT’s 9-11 A-team on the ongoing tragedy of 9-11, the reprehensible failure of our governmental, security, legal and press organizations to not be savaging the 9-11 commission fairy tale.
The real perpetrators are still out walking around, knowing they have a tried-and-true successful template in their pocket to redeploy at a time of their choosing in an updated fashion. The anomalies of 9-11 just scream out at you, yet our entire security structure seems to have been struck dumb by a secret space weapon.
Not one official with any standing at all, has challenged VT’s 9-11 reporting. That includes mass media, which, to date, has not put in one call “to learn more”, and perhaps revisit their own coverage, or should I say coverup.
But they are not all to blame, as America’s institutions have stood down on 9-11 en masse, which gives the public some cover, because they would tend to think that if the commission report really were a fraud, surely some important groups would be screaming about it.
But Gordon has the perfect answer to that. It’s one of his favorite lines, “Welcome to how the world really works.”  Read the rest of the article on the link  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/10/05/911-filling-in-the-map-tracing-the-nukes/

From "Chabad seeks to re-built Khazaria in Ukraine"           
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalization_eu12.htm​
"Radical Zionist sect Chabad seeks to move to Ukraine from the USA. They want to build in Ukraine a "City on the Hill", preventatively destroying the local population just in case…"

- ​Andrey:"Все беды украинского недогосударства "Пеця и Ко" успешно вешают на простых украинцев. При этом показывают им по ТВ круглые сутки что все это происки Кремля и москалей! Без взятия Киева эта гангрена будет гнить и дальше бесконечно долго! А между тем украинские журналисты узнали об экстренном визите Климкина в Израиль... По слухам, для команды Вальцмана-Гройсмана было куплено несколько вилл в престижном районе Тель Авива. Кастрюль на утилизацию, а Порошенко на родину. "  

- гифка.нет:"Климкина на днях обнаружили в Израиле. Как рассказывают некоторые аналитиги и експерды министр иностранных дел Украины поехал договариваться об эвакуации Вальцмана с Гройсманом на родину."

“The best way to help Israel… is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad"- on Nov. 30, 2015 Hillary Clinton states her reason to help armed groups to overthrow democratically elected president of Syria Bashar Assad.
Don’t Call Him “Bernie” Anymore: the Sanders Sell-Out and the Clinton Wars to Come
by GARY LEUPP
The worst disservice Sanders has done to his supporters, other than to lead them on a wild goose chase for real change, is to virtually ignore his rival’s vaunted “experience.” He need not have mentioned Hillary Clinton’s Senate record, since there was nothing there; her stint as law-maker was merely intended to position her for a run for the presidency, according to the family plan. But there was a lot in her record as Secretary of State.
As she recounts in her memoir, she wanted a heftier “surge” in Afghanistan than Obama was prepared to order. Anyone paying attention knows that the entire military mission in that broken country has been a dismal failure producing blow-back on a mind-boggling scale, even as the Taliban has become stronger, and controls more territory, than at any time since its toppling in 2001-2002.
Hillary wanted to impose regime change on Syria in 2011, by stepping up assistance to armed groups whom (again) anyone paying attention knows are in cahoots with al-Nusra (which is to say, al-Qaeda). In an email dated Nov. 30, 2015, she states her reason: “The best way to help Israel…is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.”
In her memoir she criticizes Obama for not doing more to oust the secular Assad regime. She has repeatedly stated during her campaign that she favors a no-fly zone over Syria, like the one she advocated for Libya. That means conflict with Russia, which is bombing sites in Syria, with the permission of its internationally recognized government, under what Russia’s leaders (and many rational people) consider to be terrorists’ control.

 ​- coltraine9:"Zionist Jews are trying to destroy Christianity AND Islam because BOTH are opposed to USURY (interest lending)... Usury gives them enormous power and allows them to enslave whole nations through perpetual debt, which eventually leads to global wars and indentured servitude in some form or the other... The whole western economy is based on usurious debt at compound interest... All of the wars that our countries have fought are because of their control over the money supply at interest lending (usury)...

But the Zionists think that if they can continue to have the West fighting against Islam, that the Goyim will never notice the Talmudic, Zionist Hand behind the curtain... They're wrong... They will be expelled from our lands just like they have before- on numerous occasions... This video, and the subject matter therein, is something that every person, especially every Christian, should have a handle upon... Because Talmudic and Kabalistic Jews have taken control of the Vatican and much of Christendom today, most Christians are unaware of the dangers they face when lending unconditional support toward the Zionist State in Palestine...

These are some of the folks that we need to reach most of all... Most will never hear us - as they have already made their bed with the Zionists - but I believe that there exists many so-called "Christian" Zionists (oxymoron) who are well-intentioned and who have just been misled through the false teachings of Cyrus Scofield, John Darby, Samuel Untermeyer, and John Hagee, who all have worked through international think-tanks like the 'Committee of 300' to divide and conquer the people of the world... It is time that we turn the tables on them - like Jesus turned over the tables of the Jewish Money Changers..." (189 Likes) 

- Utoy Cruz:"i never thought Jews hated the Lord Jesus this much until I saw your video, I just know they do not believe in him as our savior..."
- MorningDew Reynolds:"What else would you expect from the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN? You should read what is written in their Talmud about our precious Savior Yahushua."
- tanny bash:"Just shows who is in control of the Christian USA the Zionist Nazi Jews how they insult and mock Jesus and his mother Mary and carry on getting billions in aid to Israel."
- from the comments below the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yle_qeeOIMA

Paul Grubach
I
As the distinguished scholar, Noam Chomsky, has noted elsewhere, even in open democratic societies such as ours, which lack the cruder forms of ideological control, there is still a public orthodoxy: a set of assumptions, ideas, and doctrines which is rarely, if ever, questioned. /1 A key aspect of the public orthodoxy is the psychosocial taboo. The latter can be defined as a private emotional aversion and a public social ban attached to certain modes of thinking and public criticism.

Specifically, if a belief deemed to be a component of the public orthodoxy is rejected, or even questioned, in public, the offender is liable to be labeled as "evil" and be subjected to social ostracism. There is a private, internal counterpart to this public inhibition if an individual who accepts the reigning public orthodoxy rejects, or questions, one of its tenets privately, he will likely subject himself to feelings of guilt approaching a kind of a holy dread." In the words of Sigmund Freud, "The violation of the taboo makes the offender himself taboo." /2

Examples of societies with public orthodoxies, which are in turn protected by psychosocial taboos, are not hard to find. For instance, consider the status of the Catholic Church and its theological doctrines in Medieval Europe and during the era of the Inquisition. To question the cardinal tenets of Christian belief was to risk not only ostracism but imprisonment, torture, and death. A more contemporary example is the case of Marxism-Leninism in the Soviet Union. Every Soviet citizen is aware that to criticize the Communist party or its ideological doctrines exposes one to charges of "bourgeois corruption," "anti-Soviet slander," and "retrogressive counter-revolution," and corresponding censure and punishment.

Finally, every sentient, dutiful American citizen knows that to criticize Jews as a group, Jewish culture, Jewish behavior patterns, the alleged Holocaust, etc., is to partake of "immoral, anti-Semitic racism." Carefully nurtured by the public media, the taboo on criticizing Jewry is deeply lodged in the consciousness of the great majority of Americans, directly influencing their acceptance or rejection of criticisms of Jewish attitudes and behavior, irrespective of the truth or falsity of such claims.
​
Is direct criticism of the Jews anti-Semitism, and, by implication, morally and politically illegitimate, and thus unworthy of serious examination? If not, what is the true meaning of the label "anti-Semitic" applied to such criticism?
This paper is directed toward those who harbor the following beliefs:

1. Criticism of the Jewish people, Jewish culture and behavior, etc., is synonymous with immoral racism;
2. At best this criticism is only to be tolerated due to First Amendment protection of free speech, or, at worst, to be censured and censored.

May the psychic chains of these opponents of taboo-free speech be broken. (continued on the next page)

From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0th3WPLAcM
​The longer version of the series a 35 minute special. A video not for the faint hearted, if you want to follow the white rabbit, keep watching and understand the other side. Fmr Rep James Traficant, Vanessa Redgrave, Beatles, John Lennon, Mel Gibson, Gary Oldman, Sean Ali Stone, Shah of Iran, President Hugo Chavez, Former President Carter, President Vladimir Putin, President John F Kennedy, Colonel Ghadafi, Princess Diana, Bobby Fischer, Russell Brand, George Galloway, Dr.David Duke, Immortal Technique, Lowkey, Dodi Al Fayed, Princess Diana, Aron Russo are all against Zionist supremacy. Which celebrity spoke out the most?"
- Kaiser Wilhelm II:"And one only wonders why they have such bad reputations. Perhaps it's because they spoke out against the Jews."
- TheRequiemMask:"Immortal Technique said it best here. We are not against the Jewish people but the Zionist movement. There are many non Jews within the NWO Zionist conspiracy."
- Colin Hastings:"Did JFK pay the ultimate price for his criticism of the Jews?"
- Lillian Jenkins:"Jimmy Carter was demonized for this, for telling the truth."
- Gypsy Prepper:"God Bless the Shah of Iran. He knew even then."
- Ricardo Santos:"He died for the same reason that Jesus and Julius Caesar died. They all harmed the business of the money changers of their era. In JFK case he was printing money without the Unconstitutional "Federal" Reserve involvement. That was the reason he was murdered." (read more on the next page)

Read more comments of the people on the next page.

From: 'The Student Revisionists' website
"There is no label more feared by prominent Gentiles than "anti-Semite." To receive this label is to kiss one's career goodbye. Well, sometimes a good old-fashioned, Marlon-Brandoesque retraction might save a career, but not without permanent damage. All politicians, journalists, stock brokers, lawyers, etc., had better know which side their bread is buttered on. Most of them do, which is how they make it to such positions in the first place. Many revisionists, even, preferring to remain apolitical, will simply deny anti-Semitic motives, and move on. This is legitimate, so long as one does not give tacit recognition to the absurd concept in the process. We at the SRRS choose to challenge this hollow accusation head-on.

We have recently discovered Paul Grubach's excellent article "A Critique of the Charge of Anti-Semitism," which perfectly outlines the problems we have with the concept.[...]

Also, the following is a passage from Neil Camberly's John Stuart Mill, Speech Prohibition, and "Neo-Nazism."

"Anti-Semitism" is a word the Jews have developed to describe speech that is critical of Jewry. It is used in almost exactly the same way the word 'scapegoating' is used: to render Jews immune to criticism (continued on the next page).​​

A very moving letter. I hope there are service men and women who still have a conscience, and transcend the "ours is not to reason why..." mentality.  Tair Kaminer
​ "I was sent to an Israeli military prison as a teenager for refusing to join the IDF - this is my letter.
Our prison uniforms are cast-offs from people in the US Army - so I wrote a letter to the man who once wore mine. Tair Kaminer is a 19-year-old conscientious objector currently incarcerated in an Israeli military prison for refusing to do compulsory military service in the IDF. "Dear Mr Smith, You don’t know me, but I feel as though we are really close. For the past 20 days I have worn your shirt. At least, the shirt that was yours while you served in the American army. Here’s the thing: I am sitting in an Israeli military prison. And our uniforms, here in the military prison, were donated to my country by your country. Yes, it is really US Army uniforms that we are wearing..."