Bev Harris of blackboxvoting.org gives Alex Jones the full details on how the elite are planning to steal the election. Comments below the video:
- Lin Speir:"Absolutely disgusting corruption."
- MUSTANG115hp:"Why have electronic voting? Canada uses paper ballots. I have been a scrutineer in two elections and all the ballots are double checked within an hour of polls closing. Electronic voting is open to fraud."
-  Mr J:"Drain the swamp already! It's overflowing with corrupt lying politicians and globalists. TRUMP 2016 ! "
- Lyle Wiley:"Just watching FOXNEWS saying Trumps ties to Russia is like nothing seen before!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FOXNEWS has been turned left, it's disgusting!! DOES TRUMP KNOW THIS VOTE FRAUD INFO?????"
- EDTHEWATERGUY:"Trump has already started draining out the swamp by repeatedly exposing the snakes." 147 likes
- Emily Matthews:"This is big, I don't know where I'd get this information if I didn't have infowars, I feel sorry for people who still get their news from the main stream media." 379 likes

- Cole's World:"Voter fraud should carry at least 10 years in prison. Those who get caught usually get a slap on the wrist. Pitiful..." 214 likes

"Early Morning Thoughts (October 14, 2016) By John Sutherland· 
That America as a country is under intense attack by really evil human and/or alien bastards should no longer be a question for any American. We are and have been under attack by many foreign and domestic enemies for decades, and today we may be in our final death throws as a country. It’s sad for any country to die, even ours. But, it is what it is. Let’s try to deal with it.

We do know that the attackers of America and other the countries (yes, sadly, America is not alone in being attacked by evil bastards) are rich and powerful evil bastards who invariably support the world’s power families – families like the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers (originally known as the Rogenfelders), the Clintons, The Bushes, the Soroses, etc. Those families are all linked together, and they are very well organized as a covert crime syndicate and gangster enterprise.

These criminals lie to us continually, they spy on us, they steal from us, they make us sick by way of poisons in our food, water, and air, they manipulate us and control our knowledge and our actions, they imprison us, and they kill us. We, the people, have become their involuntary victims. Many of us don’t like being their victims, and many of us verbalize our complaints against them. Sadly, many of us still do not ‘get it’ that we are under attack.

But, you know what? Many of the crime lords, like the evil bastards who are using our US military to destroy the middle east for the benefit of greater Zionist Israel and who are saber rattling with Russia, choose to stay hidden from our purview. We don’t know exactly who is making the individual day-to-day death and destruction decisions. For example, it is not general knowledge who specifically, and by individual name, directs our CIA’s actions, our covert military actions, our naval ships deployment, the use of our spy satellites, etc. 

“The best way to help Israel… is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad"- on Nov. 30, 2015 Hillary Clinton states her reason to help armed groups to overthrow democratically elected president of Syria Bashar Assad.
Don’t Call Him “Bernie” Anymore: the Sanders Sell-Out and the Clinton Wars to Come
by GARY LEUPP
The worst disservice Sanders has done to his supporters, other than to lead them on a wild goose chase for real change, is to virtually ignore his rival’s vaunted “experience.” He need not have mentioned Hillary Clinton’s Senate record, since there was nothing there; her stint as law-maker was merely intended to position her for a run for the presidency, according to the family plan. But there was a lot in her record as Secretary of State.
As she recounts in her memoir, she wanted a heftier “surge” in Afghanistan than Obama was prepared to order. Anyone paying attention knows that the entire military mission in that broken country has been a dismal failure producing blow-back on a mind-boggling scale, even as the Taliban has become stronger, and controls more territory, than at any time since its toppling in 2001-2002.
Hillary wanted to impose regime change on Syria in 2011, by stepping up assistance to armed groups whom (again) anyone paying attention knows are in cahoots with al-Nusra (which is to say, al-Qaeda). In an email dated Nov. 30, 2015, she states her reason: “The best way to help Israel…is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.”
In her memoir she criticizes Obama for not doing more to oust the secular Assad regime. She has repeatedly stated during her campaign that she favors a no-fly zone over Syria, like the one she advocated for Libya. That means conflict with Russia, which is bombing sites in Syria, with the permission of its internationally recognized government, under what Russia’s leaders (and many rational people) consider to be terrorists’ control.

Trump's gun comment interpreted as violent threat against Clinton. If DEMs are resorting to this kind of twisting of the truth, they must be really desperate... Those that love the 2nd amendment know exactly what Trump meant. Democrats do as well. Vote Trump in November. We have had enough of lying, crooked politicians. No more Clintons! Enough is enough!

It is my opinion that a prolonged armed conflict would erupt in this country if the 2nd amendment was ever repealed or the right ever stripped of its citizens. That should scare anyone enough to never giving a thought to pursuing such a foolish venture. The National Rifle Association, which has endorsed Trump and is airing ads on his behalf, tweeted out support for his remarks as a call for voters to defend the Second Amendment and vote against Clinton. Get it? Let me get this straight. Trump talks about guns and Hillary feels threatened? Should we add paranoia to the list of her best qualities? 

Maybe you all forgot how this country came into existence. Hint: it wasn't the Colonials hiding in their closets because all their rights were taken away. Personally, I'm a Jimmy Hoffa fan. I am referring to Hoffa's ability to stand on his own two feet and fight the status quo. Something we rarely see these days because of the political correctness phenomenon. And Hoffa was doing it as a union leader. Political correctness is not the way to go and sometimes the higher ups understand only one language. Speak and act from the heart, folks. That's why Trump is so popular and Hillary is not. (Read more below)

It doesn't mater who the people vote for, what maters is who counts the votes! But do you all really want WWIII just to put Hillary in the Oval Office? Hillary is a Neocon just like George W. Bush!
​COMMENTS OF THE PEOPLE  (from internet sources):
- Josh Jennings:"Putin knows it's a threat to Russia and every other nation if she wins."It doesn't mater who the people vote for, what maters is who counts the votes! But a Vote for Hillary is a vote for Nuclear Holocaust! Do you all really want WWIII just to put Hillary in the Oval Office? Hillary is a Neocon just like George W. Bush!
- Max Liam · New York, New York:"Putin has made it very clear he wants a new and positive relationship with the USA, Putin has arrest warrants for Financial Terrorists George Soros and Jacob Rothschild. Putin is aware of the globalist agenda and does not want this for Russia. Right now the globalists have 1800 American boys on the Russian border conducting military drills meant to provoke Russia while Putin has been clear offering a hand of friendship."​
- Harvey Kahler · Rail transportation planner at Retired:"The US has been building up in Eastern Europe under neocon influence of Clinton and Kerry and is at least suspected in supporting the overthrow on the democratically elected government in Ukraine as reported in other sources; and you wonder why Putin is warning about her election?"
- John Aiello · Paterson, New Jersey:"Putin is just telling us the consequences of the dumbass evil choice that you will make for Hillary." 
- Lee Little · School of The Hard Knox:"Putin cannot tell us who we pick as president but he has certainly warned us about who we must not pick... He is just stating obvious facts. We fell a sleep for many years in the USA."
- Brian Siegesmund · Mobile, Alabama:"Putin seems a lot smarter than most Americans !"
- Russell Orr · Long Haul Driver at Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.:"Putin knows Hillary and what evil she is. He wants to rid the world of evil and if we can't do it, he will."
- Marvin Machleit:"He's not telling us who to vote for. He's merely stating that Hillary is a hawk who will do things to endanger Russia's interests and Putin can't as their leader let that happen. She has been a bad apple ever since she was fired from the Watergate investigation and she has a long history of unethical actions and people dying who had the goods on her and slick Willie. Donald John Trump will strive for peace and jobs contrary to what you, stinking socialists, have said about him."
- Peter Currie:"He is only saying what many of us here in the west already see - Hillary is a war monger. Hillary is extremely dangerous. If you want to keep up the great American tradition of betraying ones children and sending them off to war to die or be maimed than vote for Killary. Maybe instead of getting your back up - listen to what Hillary says - she is a savage!"

James Craven, Professor of Economics and Geography (semi-retired) 
​"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive" Sir Walter Scott. Lies can only beget more lies to cover the first; cover-ups can only beget more cover-ups; failure to prosecute crimes and criminals not only begets more crimes and criminals, but begets precedents of non-prosecution, non-punishment and non-exposure, to be used for others to escape justice and exposure; e.g. Petraeus' (fellow CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission attendee with Clintons) handling by FBI and DOJ used by Clinton to be used by others.
FBI ATTEMPTS SPECIAL NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS FOR FBI AGENTS INVOLVED IN CLINTON CASE 
ATTORNEYS INTEND TO ASK FOR 'THE CLINTON DEAL' FOR THEIR OWN CLIENTS ALLEGED TO HAVE COMMITTED HILLARY'S ALLEGED OFFENSES.

Paul Grubach
I
As the distinguished scholar, Noam Chomsky, has noted elsewhere, even in open democratic societies such as ours, which lack the cruder forms of ideological control, there is still a public orthodoxy: a set of assumptions, ideas, and doctrines which is rarely, if ever, questioned. /1 A key aspect of the public orthodoxy is the psychosocial taboo. The latter can be defined as a private emotional aversion and a public social ban attached to certain modes of thinking and public criticism.
Specifically, if a belief deemed to be a component of the public orthodoxy is rejected, or even questioned, in public, the offender is liable to be labeled as "evil" and be subjected to social ostracism. There is a private, internal counterpart to this public inhibition if an individual who accepts the reigning public orthodoxy rejects, or questions, one of its tenets privately, he will likely subject himself to feelings of guilt approaching a kind of a holy dread." In the words of Sigmund Freud, "The violation of the taboo makes the offender himself taboo." /2
Examples of societies with public orthodoxies, which are in turn protected by psychosocial taboos, are not hard to find. For instance, consider the status of the Catholic Church and its theological doctrines in Medieval Europe and during the era of the Inquisition. To question the cardinal tenets of Christian belief was to risk not only ostracism but imprisonment, torture, and death. A more contemporary example is the case of Marxism-Leninism in the Soviet Union. Every Soviet citizen is aware that to criticize the Communist party or its ideological doctrines exposes one to charges of "bourgeois corruption," "anti-Soviet slander," and "retrogressive counter-revolution," and corresponding censure and punishment. Finally, every sentient, dutiful American citizen knows that to criticize Jews as a group, Jewish culture, Jewish behavior patterns, the alleged Holocaust, etc., is to partake of "immoral, anti-Semitic racism." Carefully nurtured by the public media, the taboo on criticizing Jewry is deeply lodged in the consciousness of the great majority of Americans, directly influencing their acceptance or rejection of criticisms of Jewish attitudes and behavior, irrespective of the truth or falsity of such claims.
Is direct criticism of the Jews anti-Semitism, and, by implication, morally and politically illegitimate, and thus unworthy of serious examination? If not, what is the true meaning of the label "anti-Semitic" applied to such criticism?
This paper is directed toward those who harbor the following beliefs:

1. Criticism of the Jewish people, Jewish culture and behavior, etc., is synonymous with immoral racism;
2. At best this criticism is only to be tolerated due to First Amendment protection of free speech, or, at worst, to be censured and censored.

May the psychic chains of these opponents of taboo-free speech be broken. (continued on the next page)

From: 'The Student Revisionists' website
"There is no label more feared by prominent Gentiles than "anti-Semite." To receive this label is to kiss one's career goodbye. Well, sometimes a good old-fashioned, Marlon-Brandoesque retraction might save a career, but not without permanent damage. All politicians, journalists, stock brokers, lawyers, etc., had better know which side their bread is buttered on. Most of them do, which is how they make it to such positions in the first place. Many revisionists, even, preferring to remain apolitical, will simply deny anti-Semitic motives, and move on. This is legitimate, so long as one does not give tacit recognition to the absurd concept in the process. We at the SRRS choose to challenge this hollow accusation head-on.

We have recently discovered Paul Grubach's excellent article "A Critique of the Charge of Anti-Semitism," which perfectly outlines the problems we have with the concept.[...]

Also, the following is a passage from Neil Camberly's John Stuart Mill, Speech Prohibition, and "Neo-Nazism."

"Anti-Semitism" is a word the Jews have developed to describe speech that is critical of Jewry. It is used in almost exactly the same way the word 'scapegoating' is used: to render Jews immune to criticism (continued on the next page).​​